Me and IM Kostya Kavutskiy covered this book in our ChessDojo bookclub。 You can view our analysis sessions as well as Kostya's final video review on our YouTube channel。The book is a disappointment， esp。 because it could have been so much better。 As I've noted in my reviews of the first two books in the series: we get the promise of something like a modern My System - but then we degenerate into long winded computer analysis that doesn't come with a verbal support structure。 Hint to the authors: Me and IM Kostya Kavutskiy covered this book in our ChessDojo bookclub。 You can view our analysis sessions as well as Kostya's final video review on our YouTube channel。The book is a disappointment， esp。 because it could have been so much better。 As I've noted in my reviews of the first two books in the series: we get the promise of something like a modern My System - but then we degenerate into long winded computer analysis that doesn't come with a verbal support structure。 Hint to the authors: I have an engine too， it's free！， and it will be even stronger in a couple years。 So what I really want is to hear Gelfand thinking， for him （somebody！） to put his thoughts into words and then the variations should be human， what he saw and what he didn't see。 And don't trick me with chapter headings that claim to be about something but then aren't （book titles too）。You can tell that the authors meant well， because the first couple chapters are more focused， then we just completely lose any kind of thread。 Good writing takes time！ 。。。more